Standing on the crest of the Oak Ridges Moraine, it’s
hard to imagine that a ship canal was planned to run
through this area. But there it was, on Geo.
Tremaine’s 1860 map of Peel County. It showed the
path of the Projected Toronto and Georgian Bay
Ship Canal winding its way from Humber Bay
through the King Township highlands to the marsh
lands at the Holland River. I wondered how they
planned on doing it. Was it ever started, and does
any of it remain?
Rowland Burr, a prosperous local businessman and
mill owner, was the initial promoter of the Ship Canal
and in 1857 plans were announced to provide a shorter
and better shipping route between Lake Ontario and
Lake Huron. It was suggested that the proposed canal
would reduce the distance between the upper Great
Lakes and the tidewaters at Quebec City or New York
by 400 miles. The Canal was an ambitious project that
would have literally changed the face of King Township.
It was to be financed by British and American bankers
to the tune of approximately one to two billion dollars,
in today’s currency. By any measure, it was a huge
undertaking.
The canal would have taken from five to seven years
to build and would stretch 100 miles, from start to finish.
It would rise from 246 feet above sea level at Lake
Ontario, follow the Humber and Holland River valleys
to Lake Simcoe, and then from Kempenfelt Bay to the
Nottawasaga River valley, exiting on Georgian Bay at
579 feet above sea level. It was a huge advancement in
canal design and would be capable of handling both
steam-powered screw driven ships, as well as sailing
vessels of a greater size than any other existing canal in
Canada at that time. It would have 41 locks measuring
250’ x 35’ with 13 feet above the sills. By comparison,
the Welland Canal of the day, had locks of only 150’ x
26.5’ by a depth of only 9 feet over its sills.
The most astounding feat of all would be a mammoth
excavation project to deal with a surface rise to approximately
186 feet, for the canal to cross the Oak Ridges
Moraine from the King-Vaughan Township line, to
where it would connect with the Holland River. Some
36 million cubic yards of clay, gravel and sand would
have to be excavated in a deep cut through the Ridge, for
a distance of nine miles and having an average depth of
about 80 feet. Massive continuous piers, formed with
boulders and concrete and faced with close piling,
would be erected on both sides of the cutting to protect
the slope.
The proposed path of the canal would follow the
river valleys, low lying marsh areas and natural valleys
through the Township. Considering the forestation and
undergrowth the surveyors would have encountered at
that time, plus the limited equipment they had to work
with, it is amazing to see how well the path of the
proposed canal followed the natural landscape. In the
Mid-1850s, however, few people would have given
much thought to the impact of the project on the environment.
Today of course, the project would be subject
to a mandatory Environmental Assessment and questions
about how it would affect the long term stability of
the forests, wetlands, wildlife and water levels let alone
the scenic landscape would have been addressed.
Unfortunately, the reason or combination of events
that lead to the canal’s demise have been “lost in the fog
of history”. It is known however, that there were several
factors in play at the time, which may have contributed
to its demise. For example, the railway boom was
gathering steam and great attention and promise was
being generated by this alternate form of transportation.
Also, the plan for the ship canal was not without its
competition from other proposed canal systems. Among
these, promoters had long since encouraged the
construction of a Montreal, Ottawa, and Georgian Bay
ship canal. It was first proposed by Colonel By when
building the Rideau Canal and even Sir Wilfred Laurier
promised, that if his party was returned to office, the
canal would be built. It did not happen, and early in the
1900s, the project, like others, gradually faded into
obscurity.
While the Toronto and Georgian Bay Ship Canal was
never built, all was not lost. Its ‘state of the art’ design,
for the time, set many new standards for canal construction.
It demonstrated that by increasing the size and
depth of its locks and by using steam and hydraulics in
their operation, larger ships could be facilitated and
encouraged to use our inland waterways. Some of these
innovations were soon incorporated into a redesigned
Lachine, St Lawrence and Welland canal systems that
ultimately resulted in the present St Lawrence Seaway.
Had the Toronto and Georgian Bay Ship canal been
built the economic benefits to the region would have been
considerable, however there is another side to the coin.
Following the path of the proposed canal through King
Township I was struck by the number of times I came
across beautiful vistas and picturesque landscapes. To
think that all this might have been lost if the canal had
been constructed - perhaps it’s just as well that it never
became anything more than a projected line on an old map. |

1. Extract from Geo. R. Tremaine’s 1860
map of Peel County showing the route of
the Projected Toronto and Georgian Bay
Ship Canal from Humber Bay to the
Holland Marsh. Some map details have
been enhanced for clarity.
Robert Hulley is a historian and photographer and a
‘Member at Large’ of the Architectural Conservancy
of Ontario (ACO). He is Past President of the Credit-
Humber Watershed Branch of the ACO, and a member
of the Humber Watershed Alliance of the Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority. Artwork and
photography is by the author.
|